In the middle of 2008, the State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC) observes
that there are 65.4 million houses in 661 cities of China have no electricity
consumption records for six consecutive months. In other words, there are 65.4
million vacant residential units which available for one hundred million people
to live. And based on that, the housing vacancy rate of China has been
calculated out as around 25% which is more than 2 times of the national
reasonable housing vacancy range (generally is 5% - 10%). Because of that, many
scholars and reporters are paid attention on the housing vacancy problem in
China and found out the even more serious truth. March of 2010, Jiyang Liang
(CPPCC National Committee member) point out this at least 40% land out of real estate
development land is still cornered by land agents, and the housing vacancy
rates of some large cities in China are reached 50%. The video below is
documentary by SBS Dateline (Australian TV) which is talks about the vacancy
problem in China.
.
However, in the meantime, the observation is seriously
against and boycotted by real estate developers. Zhiqiang Ren (the board
chairman of Hua Yuan Group which is a famous real estate agency in China)
argues that the housing vacancy rate in China is only 4% which indicates that
there are no bubbles in Chinese realty business.
25% or
4%, which is right? To be honest, I don't know the 25% is right or not. Through
calculate price-to-rents ratio and price-income ratio, I can absolutely make
sure that 4% is totally wrong. In general, the price-to-rents ratio should
around 1/200 and couldn't lower than 1/250, which means that we can withdraw
our investment funds with 200-250 monthly rents. In other words, this kind of
investment is valuable, if not, then the investment is loss or in long-term
depreciation which is no investment value. However, it in Shenzhen is lower
than 1/500 and in Shanghai and Beijing is around 1/480. Therefore, the real
estate in China actually has no investment values. The price-income ratio is
another important tool to evaluate the bubbles in real estate. This ratio in Beijing
is 1/20 and in some cities is around 1/40 which are obviously higher than the
national reasonable range (1/3-1/6). Based on the comparison of two ratios
above, the result is clearly showed out the 25% housing vacancy rate should be
a reasonable estimate and there are serious bubbles in Chinese real estate.
没有评论:
发表评论